Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vintage Sound Machine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 07:17, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Vintage Sound Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable local band that has no coverage in reliable sources. It was tagged for speedy deletion shortly after creation (about six months ago), but the creator removed the speedy delete tag. Rather than try for another speedy delete, I've decided to nominate for deletion. Fails WP:BAND and only get around 50 Google hits. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- delete NOTMYSPACE Andy Dingley (talk) 13:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I cannot find any evidence that these guys meet the criteria for inclusion set out at WP:BAND or the general notability guide. — sparklism hey! 07:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - no coverage found in reliable sources for this group; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND at this time. Gongshow talk 03:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.