Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Snita

Snita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Fails WP:MUSBIO. Page written by the person herself. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm adding Snita Pramanik to this discussion, as it appears to be about the same person. If I've done this incorrectly, please correct the addition - I don't think I've added anything to an AfD before. Peridon (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

I have speedy deleted Snita Pramanik since it was a virtually identical (but shorter) version of Snita. --MelanieN (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Don't see the COI very explicitly, but definitely promotional in tone with no outstandingly usable independent sources found. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 14:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
• Delete I don't know who is writing this, but they definitely don't seem to take any notice of warnings. She may be a great singer, but a list of what looks like every gig she's performed at isn't what an encyclopaedia article is about. I usually look through 10 pages of ghits, but I've gone to 16 this time because it's not an easy search. I went through again taking out 'mahey', 'mehay' and 'marcin' and still can't see anything that looks like this Snita. The author doesn't give any references either. I'll have one last try at communicating with the author, but don't hold your breath... Peridon (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Article too immature and unsourced for the mainspace as of now. Content from both Snita and Snita Pramanik has been added to Draft talk:Snita Pramanik, from where it may be picked up for developing the draft. SD0001 (talk) 13:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• Comment @Peridon: About that second article, Snita Pramanik: Would it be eligible for A10 speedy? Looks like a smaller but identical version of the Snita article. --MelanieN (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

That ping worked. Oh hang on, they've patched it now. Probably would count as an A10. Are you working on this one too? I asked Ritchie to take a look after I couldn't find anything - but the surname came up from the other article. You wouldn't believe how many Snitas there are.... Peridon (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Not working on it, just came to look at the AfD after noticing your note on Ritchie's page. Since you concur with A10 I will go ahead and delete it. It's not uncommon for something to be speedied in the middle of an AfD. That will simplify this discussion in any case. --MelanieN (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

• Delete and salt this and Snita Pramanik I found a passing mention in the Kolkata Telegraph but that's it. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

• Delete -Doesn't appear to be meeting Wikipedia's inclusion criteria at this time. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:MUSICBIO. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 01:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.