Talk:Electrohomeopathy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electrohomeopathy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recent removal
[edit]Regarding this recent removal and edit summary "this quote or any mention of electrohomeopathy or Mattei is nowhere in the ref" [1]. This is not accurate.
The paper can be read here in full [2]. On page 238 we find:
- "The electro-homeopathic system is an invention of Count Mattei who prates of "red," "blue," and "green" electricity, a theory that, in spite of its utter idiocy, has attracted a considerable following and earned a large fortune for its chief promoter".
- On this article, the removed text contained a quote which was "The electrohomeopathic system is an invention of Count Mattei who prates of "red," "blue," and "green" electricity, a theory that has attracted a considerable following and earned a large fortune for its chief promoter".
A user [3] removed "in spite of its utter idiocy" which is dishonest editing. Old versions of the article contain the full quote [4]. I suggest we restore the full quote and not the dishonest cherry-picking of the quote. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- The source you added twice was [5] which is a different source than the one above and it did not contain the quote. Sjö (talk) 06:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- You are correct, sorry about that. The confusion stems from the fact this is a 2-part article. The paper that was originally on the article for a long time was the "concluded" version which didn't contain the quote. Psychologist Guy (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- The article could be expanded. Search on Hathitrust or JSTOR for "Matteism", many other historical sources exist. For example, journals of the time dismissed it at quackery [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] etc. These may not all be reliable but a lot of sources exist that mention "Matteism", it is what electrohomeopathy was originally known as. I will have a look for other sources on this at a later date. Psychologist Guy (talk) 07:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- You are correct, sorry about that. The confusion stems from the fact this is a 2-part article. The paper that was originally on the article for a long time was the "concluded" version which didn't contain the quote. Psychologist Guy (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Unreliable source
[edit]The website electropathy.info fails WP:RS; I suggest that we remove this source from the article which is currently being used in the lead. The source was added by Vedantsethia who may have a WP:COI with this website as seen from their talk-page. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class Alternative medicine articles
- Start-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles