Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shia jurisprudence and development
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Shia jurisprudence and development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Erudite essay discussing whether Shia jurisprudence hinders development, but better suited to an academic symposium than an encyclopedia article. Mccapra (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Personal essay and unencyclopedic, but it wouldn't hurt for someone to expand the page of Ja'fari jurisprudence. Zaynab1418 (talk) 22:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, very much an essay. Oaktree b (talk) 23:19, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Essay. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Anything worthwhile can be transposed into other Islamic jurisprudence articles. As mentioned above, this reads like an essay. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete since it's quite evident the subject lacks any claim to independent notability. This is, as already indicated above by other contributors, yet another personal essay attempting to claim a Wikipedia article. And the fact that the text's creator has been identified as a dirty sock does not help much. This merits a respectful defenestration, in tandem possibly with a generous move over to Principles of Islamic jurisprudence of any worthwhile text. -The Gnome (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.