Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The First four serials of Star Jalsha
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- The First four serials of Star Jalsha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-article, this is original research and/or just a random collection of things. EachThree of the four listed shows and the channel have their own article and there is no reference for the idea that these four shows as a group are somehow notable qua a group. Other than the lede, the article is nothing but a discription of the four shows.
DragonflySixtyseven previously deleted.
A merger to STAR Jalsha might be feasible, though this article is much larger. It could also be reduced to be an article about the fourth show. Doug.(talk • contribs) 22:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as unencyclopedic OR/PR. The only trivia/fact worth merging into Star Jalsha would have been that the first four serials on the channel "completed 100 episodes since launch", but that detail is not even confirmed by the cited, sources; I don't know if it happens to be true, but in any case this page need not exist as an article or a redirect. Abecedare (talk) 01:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:OR, the concept of the first four serials isn't made by any source. Any useful information count be merged to main article but please take some caution. The article creator has had issues with directly copying information from sources or at best minimal/too close paraphrasing. Ravensfire (talk) 02:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment: - creator blocked indefinitely for meatpuppetry on 26 March [1]--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)- Speedy delete-I have tagged tons of this guys pages for prods just now btw. Wgolf (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.